Web 2.0 21 Feb 2006 06:22 am

Sometimes Web 2.0 is Underkill

Foldera has an interesting product that looks to take a project-centric approach to organising information.

Whilst this has been tried in the past, Foldera might have finally reached the right balance — if only they were a desktop application. But they’re not; it’s a web app, albeit a pretty ajaxian one, and I think this is an example of basically choosing the wrong platform.

Maybe they didn’t want to challenge Outlook, maybe they thought zero-install was the only way to distribute a product now, maybe they thought businesses are just waiting for the right application before moving their most important data onto an unknown providers infrastructure, maybe they thought the small-just-starting-all-we-need-is-a-web-app (something I like to call the SJSAWNIAWA sector) is a big unknown “long-tail” market… But why hamstring terrific ideas like this with the scale, speed and privacy issues of a web app.

Web 2.0 has it’s advantages, but I think sometimes the allure of being part of a new generation of web applications blinds us to the practicalities of choosing ultimately what’s best for the user.

One Response to “Sometimes Web 2.0 is Underkill”

  1. on 21 Feb 2006 at 7:47 pm 1. said …

    […] Following that, is it really that much of an advantage being strictly web-based? Wouldn’t its target user do just as well, if not better, with a seemingly faster desktop app? (Martin Wells cogitates) […]

Trackback This Post | Subscribe to the comments through RSS Feed

Leave a Reply